IG Nobelit jaettu!

Rere
Reactions:
Viestit: 3424
Liittynyt: 01 Joulu 2022, 15:43

IG Nobelit jaettu!

Viesti Kirjoittaja Rere »

Nyt on Ig Nobelit taas kerran jaettu. Näin se tiede edistyy suurin harppauksin ja tieteen tekijät saavat ansaitut palkintonsa. Savorinen pitäisi saada ehdolle. Olen melko varma että hän nappaisi tämän arvostetun tunnustuksen. Tuossa lisää asiasta ja Ig Nobelin kotisivuilta voi lukea tarkemmin ja katsoa videon juhlallisuukista.

https://phys.org/news/2024-09-pigeon-mi ... y-nwletter

Ps. Onkohan missään jonkinlaista koostetta Savorisen teorioista?
Avatar
Stalker
Reactions:
Viestit: 2906
Liittynyt: 05 Joulu 2022, 12:43

Re: IG Nobelit jaettu!

Viesti Kirjoittaja Stalker »

Rere kirjoitti: 14 Syys 2024, 08:06 Nyt on Ig Nobelit taas kerran jaettu. Näin se tiede edistyy suurin harppauksin ja tieteen tekijät saavat ansaitut palkintonsa. Savorinen pitäisi saada ehdolle. Olen melko varma että hän nappaisi tämän arvostetun tunnustuksen. Tuossa lisää asiasta ja Ig Nobelin kotisivuilta voi lukea tarkemmin ja katsoa videon juhlallisuukista.

https://phys.org/news/2024-09-pigeon-mi ... y-nwletter

Ps. Onkohan missään jonkinlaista koostetta Savorisen teorioista?
Uuden Suomen palstalla Savorinen taitaa päivittää aktiivisimmin "teoriaansa", teoria kehittyy niin nopeasti ettei hän ehdi tehdä yhteenvetoa.
Muissakin somen syövereissä hän on aktiivinen, etsivä löytää.
Uunostakin on tehty tutkielma
https://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/177517?show=full
Savorisesta voisi väitellä tohtoriksi, saisikohan sillä IG Nobelin?
Avatar
Stalker
Reactions:
Viestit: 2906
Liittynyt: 05 Joulu 2022, 12:43

Re: IG Nobelit jaettu!

Viesti Kirjoittaja Stalker »

Savorinen asks. Are there electrons around the nuclei of atoms at all,
The atomic model has had time to change into a different form already before,
Sometimes it was assumed that electrons orbit nuclei, etc.,
Today we talk about electron curtains around nuclei etc.?,
What if nothing stays around the cores. In the core, there would be congestion areas of energy dispersing into space,
Inside these congestion areas of space-dispersed energy, more and more space-dispersed energy would be pushed all the time. ,
Their internal pressure would increase if the energy in them was not constantly dispersed over a larger and larger area of space ,
This space-dispersing energy would also constantly be pushed out of these areas of congestion of energy dissipating into space. ,
Congestion areas of expanding energy would recycle energy dissipating into space with all other similar congestion areas,
and at the same time these expanding energy congestion areas automatically,
push each other away from each other in the same ratio as they expand.,
So it can be stated that the nuclei of atoms expand and circulate the expanding dark energy,
as zillions of separate expanding densifications whose expansion can be accelerated so fast by a photon pushing towards the core,
that they don't have time to push each other away from each other as fast as they expand,
At this stage, a new registrable electron is born / combines from the expanding dark energy,
which continues to push away from the expanding core, still consisting of energy that expands / disperses into a larger area of space,
So physicists think they can remove electrons that are already around nuclei,,
although possibly completely new electrons are born,
I think physicists should take this point of view into consideration,
What makes this view very interesting is that the stars would be born on the same principle,
zillions of expanding dark matter particles / densifications that are constantly being pushed out,
of expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies,
Expanding galaxies would have formed from the center outwards in the early days of the rapidly expanding visible universe in space,
when two expanding supermassive objects moved close to each other,
Separate expanding condensations of dark matter pushed through each other,
over and over again and it would have made them expand so fast that they wouldn't have ,
time pushes each other away from each other as fast as they expanded,
At this point, they would have started to merge into new expanding stars quickly without the pulling force and without the bumpy bumpy curvature of space,
Maybe with the help of the James Webb telescope it will be discovered that the stars were born,
As if out of nowhere. But of course not out of nowhere, you know,
At least it already shows that galaxies were born very quickly in the early days of the visible universe.,
That is, massive and ready-made galaxies are observed in the very young visible universe.,
Expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies would have been born,
in our own 3 D big bangs with the same principle,
Nowadays, the so-called the background radiation would be the expanding light that was created when these expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies were born in their own 3D big bangs already quite far from each other. ,
Over the course of time, the expanding background radiations would have shaped each other of equal quality as they have encountered each other, interacted and accelerated each other's expansion and at the same time speed in the same proportion as matter and light have expanded in space outward into the already existing space. ,
Expanding galaxies would be large particles that convey information about the object,,
which is quite massive and dense as it radiates energy that has the nature of galaxies,
Of course, we cannot detect the object in question that we are moving away from,
Galaxies would therefore be particles that transmit information about it ,
There would be an infinite number of similar objects in an infinite 3D space and they would always recycle the existing energy / pushing force. ,
Millions of billions of years of scattered energy would push towards them at an extremely fast speed into space. ,
The energy / pushing force pushed to the center of the objects in question would be compressed there once again into extremely dense energy. ,
Before that, the speed of this extremely fast energy would have slowed down as this energy would have been pushed through more new quarks expanding into space. ,
In the context of pushing through new expanding quarks, this extremely fast energy would have accelerated the expansion / dispersion of the energy in the expanding quarks in space to a larger and larger region of space. ,
extremely fast energy would also be pushed through our expanding visible universe in space all the time, flowing from every direction. ,
It would accelerate the expansion of our quarks expanding in space. ,
Infinite 3D space would never have been born. And it wouldn't affect the events in any way. It would be just a 3D stage which IS nothing at all. ,
This is what Isaac Newton assumed a long time ago. That is, that space is just a 3D scene that does not affect the events. ,
Perhaps Einstein opened the Pandora's box of physics with the concept of curved space. ,
After all, it is not needed if all lights also consist for the most part of expanding dark waves that interact with each other and accelerate each other's expansion. ,
If so, then expanding light that has experienced entropy for billions of years is pushed towards the expanding stars and galaxies, which contains a very small scale energy / pushing force that collides with the photons pushing past the stars and galaxies, so that these photons are pushed more towards the stars and galaxies than they are pushed away from them away. ,
On Earth on March 17, 2024
Savorinen Jukka
Poista suositus Vastaa Viestiin